LawByHeart knows your matter, knows where it stands, and gets the next legal work ready.
Select either record to inspect it in full
In the Court of the V Senior Civil Judge
Ranga Reddy District · L.B. Nagar
I, , aged years, residing at , the Plaintiff in the above matter, do hereby solemnly affirm and state that I am acquainted with the facts and records of the suit.
1). I am the Plaintiff in the above suit and am competent to swear to this affidavit. The matter is posted for plaintiff evidence before this Hon'ble Court.
2). The accompanying documents and authorities have been reviewed for the next hearing. The statements made herein are true to my knowledge and based on the records maintained in the ordinary course.
3). Personal names, addresses, signatures and identifying particulars are intentionally redacted in this public demonstration copy.
Wherefore
It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to receive this affidavit and pass such orders as the Court deems fit.
Verification
Verified at L.B. Nagar that the contents above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. No material fact has been concealed.
01
Order, petition, notice or case file
02
Parties, posture and sources connected
03
Research and drafting grounded in context
04
The file moves forward with continuity
Four current LawByHeart workflows, recorded directly from the application and kept in the order legal work actually moves.
Move through a filing as lawyers see it: structured pages, packet navigation, court formatting, and a live review workbench.
Draft court-ready documents, research with verified citations, and resolve disputes online — all from one place.
Move through structured pages, court formatting, packet navigation, and review tools inside the current LawByHeart editor.
Research
Search indexed Indian judgments and inspect the authority behind a surfaced citation before it enters your work. Court, decision, and source context stay visible on the same screen.
2024 INSC 293 · Supreme Court
An easement of necessity under Section 13 requires necessity for enjoying the dominant heritage; an available alternative route defeats that claim.
(2010) 2 SCC 689 · Supreme Court
A pathway easement may arise by implied grant where the surrounding facts, prior use, and conduct demonstrate the grantor’s intention.
(2005) 1 SCC 471 · Supreme Court
A prescriptive easement requires specific pleading and proof of peaceful, open, uninterrupted, as-of-right use for the statutory period.
Resolve
Online Dispute Resolution with guided filing, video hearings, source-linked award drafting, and Aadhaar eSign execution records. Every stage stays visible on one case timeline.
ODR Case File
Suresh Kumar Reddyv.Vikram Reddy
LBH-ODR-2024/0247·Borewell easement · Ranga Reddy District
Filed
15.12.2024
Claim filed · fee paid
Notice Served
16.12.2024
Email + SMS delivery
Video Hearing
28.12.2024
Both parties · 47 min
Award Drafted
29.12.2024
Source-linked citations · §15 IEA
Aadhaar eSigned
30.12.2024
Provider audit trail · both parties
SETTLEMENT AWARD
WHEREAS the parties dispute access to the jointly owned borewell at Survey No. 78, Village Chevella, Ranga Reddy District, and have voluntarily submitted to mediation under the Mediation Act, 2023, this Tribunal records the following terms of settlement:
1). Both parties shall enjoy unrestricted access to the borewell on alternate days commencing 01.01.2025.
2). The locked gate installed on 18.11.2024 shall be removed by Vikram Reddy within seven days of this Award.
3). Plaintiff withdraws O.S. No. 120 of 2025 before the V Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, with no order as to costs.
Plaintiff · Aadhaar eSign
Suresh Kumar Reddy
XXXX-XXXX-1000
30.12.2024 14:23 IST
Defendant · Aadhaar eSign
Vikram Reddy
XXXX-XXXX-1137
30.12.2024 14:51 IST
One matter. Continuous context.
A matter should not depend on a perfect court-data connection. Start from an order, petition, typed detail or official import. LawByHeart brings the material into one working memory.
CNR is optional enrichment.
When official court data is available, it enriches the matter. It never blocks the advocate from beginning or continuing work.
01 · Bring the file in
Voice capture can add a date, task or case note while you work.
02 · Matter is understood
Parties
4 connected
Stage
Plaintiff evidence
Documents
12 organised
Next date
18 Sep 2026
03 · Work moves forward
Questions inherit the matter, forum, posture and documents already on file.
Facts and authorities are carried into work without briefing the system again.
Orders, tasks, documents and the next safe action come together before hearing.
The whole practice, organised by matter
Select a capability to explore how it connects to your matter.
Matter workspace
Bring papers, parties, posture, procedure, dates and the next safe action into one continuous file.
Document-first intake · CNR as optional enrichment
Built for professional judgment
Matter Memory is not one undifferentiated AI summary. Facts retain their source and verification state, so an advocate can tell what is official, what was personally confirmed, and what still needs attention.
Nothing important changes silently.
New dates, extracted facts and conflicts are presented for review before it becomes Matter Memory.
Matter provenance
Official record
Court record or published legal source
Advocate confirmed
Reviewed and accepted by counsel
LawByHeart inferred
Derived from the available matter material
Needs confirmation
Conflicting or incomplete information
Suggested next action
Confirm affidavit signature before filing
Before you bring in a matter
The product should explain its boundaries as clearly as its capabilities.
No. Begin with an order, petition, notice, typed case detail or manual entry. A CNR can enrich the matter with official court information when that service is available.
Matter information is labelled by origin: official record, advocate confirmed, LawByHeart inferred, or needs confirmation. Sources remain visible when work moves into research and drafting.
Yes. Existing papers are the natural starting point. LawByHeart can bring the document into the matter, organise extracted details, and ask you to confirm important facts before relying on them.
Your matter still works. Court data is an enrichment source, not the foundation of the workspace. You can continue from documents and advocate-confirmed details, and add an official record later when it becomes available.
Yes. The matter is the shared context for its papers, questions, research and drafts. That reduces repeated briefing while still letting you inspect and correct the facts used for each task.
LawByHeart is designed for connected matter work across advocates and legal teams. Team access and higher-volume workflows depend on the workspace configuration selected for the firm.
LawByHeart keeps source and confirmation states visible, limits public claims to implemented controls, and provides dedicated privacy and grievance routes. Firms can discuss deployment, access and retention requirements before onboarding.
No. It prepares and connects legal work while keeping confirmation with the advocate. Important dates, facts, authorities and external actions remain reviewable.
Beyond the workspace
LawByHeart Desk
Judgments, court updates and practice intelligence—source-conscious reporting built around what an advocate needs to understand or do next.
Visit LawByHeart DeskLawByHeart Practice Bar
A selective professional community for advocates, law students, educators and legal-operations professionals who teach useful workflows and shape the product responsibly.
Explore the Practice BarStart with the paper already in your hand. LawByHeart will help you understand the file, prepare the work, and keep the next action connected. Free to start, no credit card.
